Legislature(1997 - 1998)

1997-02-26 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0484
SB 56                                                                        
The following was read the second time:                                        
                                                                               
SENATE BILL NO. 56                                                            
An Act relating to tourist oriented directional signs that are 90             
inches in width and 18 inches in height, relating to penalties for             
violations related to outdoor advertising, and annulling a regulation          
of the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities.                     
                                                                               
with the:                                                 Journal Page         
                                                                               
	FIN RPT HCS(FIN) 5DP 3NR 1AM                                      440         
	SENATE ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DOT) 1/29/97                             440         
                                                                               
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Kemplen:                         
                                                                               
Page 3, line 8:                                                                
Delete shall                                                                  
Insert may                                                                    
                                                                               
                                                                               
Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that                  
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 1                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  27   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule,             
Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia                                      
                                                                               

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0485
SB 56                                                                        
Nays:  Austerman, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green,                 
Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin,            
Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders,                
Therriault, Vezey, Williams                                                    
                                                                               
Absent:  Barnes                                                                
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 2 was offered  by Representative Croft:                           
                                                                               
Page 3, line 23, through page 4, line 2:                                       
	Delete all material.                                                          
                                                                               
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.                               
                                                                               
Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that                    
Amendment No. 2 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 2                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  13   NAYS:  23   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  4                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Elton, Grussendorf,             
Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia                               
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley,                
Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder,             
Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey                   
                                                                               
Absent:  Barnes, Martin, Ogan, Williams                                        
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0486
SB 56                                                                        
Amendment No. 3 was offered  by Representative Croft:                           
                                                                               
Page 3, line 11, following "determined":                                       
	Insert "by the department"                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that                    
Amendment No. 3 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 3                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  13   NAYS:  25   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  2                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Bunde, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Elton, Grussendorf,             
Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia                               
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green,                
Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek,             
Mulder, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey,          
Williams                                                                       
                                                                               
Absent:  Martin, Ogan                                                          
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
Amendment No. 4 was offered  by Representative Croft:                           
                                                                               
Page 3, lines 21 - 22:                                                         
	Delete "In scenic areas, the department shall control the location            
of directional signs in a manner that maintains the quality of scenic          
areas."                                                                        
	Insert "The department may not permit the placement of                        
directional signs in scenic areas."                                            
                                                                               
Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that                    
Amendment No. 4 be adopted.                                                    

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0487
SB 56                                                                        
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 4                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  10   NAYS:  29   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen,           
Kookesh, Moses, Nicholia                                                       
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson,                 
Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring,           
Kott, Kubina, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan,           
Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams                                           
                                                                               
Absent:  Martin                                                                
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
Amendment No. 5 was offered  by Representative Berkowitz:                       
                                                                               
Page 3, line 8:                                                                
	Delete "shall erect, or permit the erection of,"                              
	Insert "may issue a permit authorizing the erection of"                       
                                                                               
Page 3, line 11, following "areas.":                                           
	Insert "The permits are valid for four years.  If the department              
issues a permit, the department shall erect, or allow the erection of, a       
tourist oriented directional sign at an appropriate location."                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that                
Amendment No. 5 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0488
SB 56                                                                        
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 5                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  10   NAYS:  26   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  4                             
                                                                               
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Elton, Grussendorf, Kemplen, Kookesh,          
Kubina, Moses, Nicholia                                                        
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davies, Davis, Dyson,                
Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring,           
Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault,        
Vezey                                                                          
                                                                               
Absent:  Joule, Martin, Rokeberg, Williams                                     
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 6 was offered  by Representative Davies:                          
                                                                               
Page 3, line 9:                                                                
Delete and outside of                                                         
                                                                               
Page 3, line 11, following industrial areas.:                                  
Delete The signs may be erected on private land adjacent to the               
rights-of-way of interstate, primary, and secondary highways in                
this state if permission for the erection of the sign is granted by            
the owner of the private land.                                                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that                   
Amendment No. 6 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0489
SB 56                                                                        
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 6                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  27   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule,             
Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia                                      
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster,                
Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott,             
Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Ryan, Sanders,                  
Therriault, Vezey, Williams                                                    
                                                                               
Absent:  Rokeberg                                                              
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
Amendment No. 7 was offered  by Representative Davies:                          
                                                                               
Page 3, line 27:                                                               
Delete $1,000                                                                 
Insert $500 for the first violation, nor more than $1,000 for a               
second violation, nor more than $2,000 for a third or subsequent               
violation                                                                      
                                                                               
Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that                   
Amendment No. 7 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Porter objected.                                                
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 7                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  26   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  2                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Elton, Grussendorf,             
Hanley, Joule, Kemplen, Kubina, Nicholia                                       

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0490
SB 56                                                                        
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green,                
Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek,             
Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault,           
Vezey, Williams                                                                
                                                                               
Absent:  Kookesh, Moses                                                        
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 8 was offered  by Representative Davies:                          
                                                                               
Page 4, following line 3, add a new bill section to read:                      
*Sec. 8.  Sec. 7 is effective January 1, 1998.                              
                                                                               
Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that                   
Amendment No. 8 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SB 56                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 8                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  9   NAYS:  29   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  2                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen,           
Kubina, Nicholia                                                               
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson,                 
Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring,           
Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan,           
Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams                                           
                                                                               
Absent:  Kookesh, Moses                                                        
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted.                                       

1997-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 0491
SB 56                                                                        
The Speaker stated that SB 56 will be in third reading on the February         
27, 1997, calendar.